Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Invasion vs Liberation.

There is this TVR Shenoy article on Tibet crisis. This is a highly biased article by the paid writer of BJP. Shenoy looks worse than his foe CPIM's articles which usually comes in their media like Kiarali TV and Deshabimani publications.

The CPIM articles will be always having some justification for interference in Nepal and non interference in Myanmar or Tibet. Since Muslim votes are crucial for victories in Kerala (With recent changes Malapuram has more seats) the old foe America is biggest enemy of CPIM. All the articles have repeated sentences globalization depoliticisation. They find CIA interference in the strike by people for land in the Quilon district. Is CIA so jobless?

During the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989 I was so shocked when Late EMS justified of the Chinese Govt who forcefully cracked it down. I was a 10th STD student. This was first incident in my life when I left felt political leaders are more hypocrite. They don't do what they preach. The irony of becoming the crucifier from the crucified is true for any movement. Anand in his book “The Fourth Nail” talks about it. Refer the links for Malayalam and English Translation. I will write a review about it later. Find the Hindu Review about the book.

Personally I hate all kinds on invasion. But from the current media it is difficult to find out which is invasion and which is liberation? Find this article on economist on Tibet. Is it biased or not? I am leaving it you.

History shows today's invasion is tomorrow's liberation and today's liberation is tomorrow's invasion. The invasion of India in Kashmir or Invasion of China and Pakistan in the Kashmir. The liberation of Bangladesh from Pakistan?? Or Invasion of India to split Pakistan.

But I felt like vomiting when India sold the Myanmar freedom fight for little bit Petrol. I hate Left parties they are more hypocrite.

No comments: